After reading through the Applegate
text I was able to make connections to the definitions of the different types
of comprehension that people possess. The types of comprehension are
Literalists, Fuzzy Thinkers, Left Fielders, Quiz Contestants, Politicians,
Dodgers, Authors, and Minimalists. The
type that I believe fits best with my type of comprehension is the Quiz
Contestant. This type of thinker searches their previous knowledge for an explanation
and disconnect from the text. A logical answer is provided but one that is
justified without the use of the information from the text. I find myself talking a lot about a subject but usually lack in using the new information learned from the text in my discussion but the information I'm comfortable/ familiar with.
The Gregory text
talked about the Velcro Theory which is characterized by learning new material
by connecting it with information already in your head. This theory is used in
almost every classroom when the teacher tries to introduce new information by
connecting it to previous knowledge or scaffolding the material with similar
concepts. The main strategies to take away from the reading is visualization/
Mind movies, asking questions, using schema, making connections, and infer about
the text. These strategies will help students succeed in comprehension of the
text by making it meaningful, sticking in their brains.
Learning about the readers in my classroom will help me better understand the knowledge they are drawing from or lack there of and how to best support them. The students comprehension type will help me figure out what fund of knowledge they connect best with and what areas they need help to further develop. I see this a lot in my placement classroom where the students will answer a question or give their thoughts to what happened in a story but lack the ability to back their thoughts up with why they think it or what details in the text helped them come to that conclusion. They can be also be characterized as Dodgers where they first start out by answering the question but then get side tracked and continue to talk about a tiny concept that has very little connection to the main idea of the entire story/ the purpose of the main question.
Do you see any of these
strategies in your classroom that your students use? What ones do you use as a
reader?